Angelina Jolie Could Not Being Listed Top Ten

Forbes has recently released the list of the most cost-effective actresses in 2009. The Australian actress Naomim Watts, who once had excellent performances in such films as the "King Kong", "Eastern Promises" , "Mulholland Drive", tops the list. What has attracted people's attention is that Angelina Jolie has not been nominated to the top ten. To enable film companies to find the female stars who have most investment potential, Forbes elected 10 female stars. Through the comparison of the data analysis, it finally concluded the overall rankings.GHD White

41-year-year-old Naomi Watts was found in her latest three movies. As long as you invest one U.S. dollar in her, you can get up to 44 U.S. dollars in return. Jennifer Connelly, who starred in "Blood Diamond" and "he is actually not that like you", ranks second. The rate of return to invest in her is 41:1, meaning that to invest one U.S. dollar in her can lead to 41 U.S. dollars in return.retired pandora jewelry

She is followed by Rachel McAdams, who played well in her two films "notebook" and "Time Traveler's wife". Therefore, the return rate for this upstart actress has reached 30:1. The fourth name is Natalie Portman. Thanks to the latest "Star Wars" and "Another Bolin family's girl", her investment rate of return is 28:1.ghds

Old Actress Queen, Merrill Streep, ranks fifth on the list. The success of "Mamma Mia" enables her to maintain her social status and popularity. With one U.S. dollar invested in her, you can get 27 U.S. dollars at the box office revenue. Among all the old actresses, she is the only one who enters the TOP10 list. Besides them, others who also become the most cost-effective female stars this year are such popular actresses as Jennifer Aniston, Halle Berry, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway and Hilary Swank, etc.GHD straighteners

However, despite her high reputation, Angelina Jolie has not been listed in the top ten. The reason is that she is the highest paid actress. Last year Jolie was paid 27 million U.S. Dollars for each film. It continues to rise this year and is far higher than her counterparts' 5 million per film. Therefore, Julie has defeated others in cost-effective. "Forbes," says that this list comes out from the 100 Hollywood stars, and is based on the box office of the films where they have starred, their DVD calculation and the incomes of television pay-per-circulation.

Other site :

Free Coupon Codes for Eyeglasses, Pass4sure, Tiffany Jewelry, UGG Shoes Purchase -- Conpon Codes.
starsclubs:Free description of PSP games, PS2 games, Xbox 360 games, Wii games and more -- Games.
GHD Hair Straighteners -- GHD Hair Straightener.